Skip to main content

Table 3 Attitudes on SAP by responses to 4-point Likert scale questions (N. 357)

From: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in children: a mixed method study on healthcare professionals attitudes

 

completely disagree

disagree

agree

completely agree

No response

N.

%

N.

%

N.

%

N.

%

N.

%

1. The hospital where I work takes into account the international GLs on SAP

3

0.8

38

10.6

238

66.7

75

21.0

3

0.8

2. SAP should be performed with first or second-generation cephalosporins

62

17.4

10

2.8

47

13.2

220

61.6

18

5.0

3. Two to 3 days of antibiotic administration are useful as a precaution after surgery

49

13.7

145

40.6

127

35.6

29

8.1

7

2.0

4. Prescription of SAP should take into account possible malpractice litigations

31

8.7

148

41.5

149

41.7

20

5.6

9

2.5

5. GLs may be supportive in case of malpractice litigations

20

5.6

2

0.6

61

17.1

270

75.6

4

1.1

6. Evidence-Based Medicine is poorly applicable in every day clinical practice

34

9.5

203

56.9

105

29.4

7

2.0

8

2.2

7. SAP duration should take into account parental expectations

134

37.5

203

56.9

15

4.2

3

0.8

2

0.6

8. SAP is needed in all surgical procedures

54

15.1

189

52.9

89

24.9

25

7.0

0

0.0

9. The threat of antibiotic resistance is overstated by the media

58

16.2

213

59.7

71

19.9

9

2.5

6

1.7

10. Antibiotic resistance concern patients different from the children cared by the Hospital where I work

80

22.4

233

65.3

34

9.5

3

0.8

7

2.0

11. The choice of drug for SAP is mainly due to cost-saving reasons

53

14.8

221

61.9

67

18.8

6

1.7

10

2.8

12. First or second-generation cephalosporins are less effective for SAP than III generation cephalosporins

42

11.8

229

64.1

52

14.6

4

1.1

30

8.4

13. Pharmaceutical companies influence antibiotics used for SAP

65

18.2

183

51.3

82

23.0

15

4.2

12

3.4

  1. N. number