Skip to main content
Download PDF

Dynamics of the bacterial gut microbiota in preterm and term infants after intravenous amoxicillin/ceftazidime treatment

BMC Pediatrics volume 20, Article number: 195 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

It is important to understand the consequences of pre-emptive antibiotic treatment in neonates, as disturbances in microbiota development during this key developmental time window might affect early and later life health outcomes. Despite increasing knowledge regarding the detrimental effect of antibiotics on the gut microbiota, limited research focussed on antibiotic treatment duration. We determined the effect of short and long amoxicillin/ceftazidime administration on gut microbiota development during the immediate postnatal life of preterm and term infants.

Methods

Faeces was collected from 63 (pre) term infants at postnatal weeks one, two, three, four and six. Infants received either no (control), short-term (ST) or long-term (LT) postpartum amoxicillin/ceftazidime treatment.

Results

Compared to control infants, ST and LT infants’ microbiota contained significantly higher abundance of Enterococcus during the first two postnatal weeks at the expense of Bifidobacterium and Streptococcus. Short and long antibiotic treatment both allowed for microbiota restoration within the first six postnatal weeks. However, Enterococcus and Bifidobacterium abundances were affected in fewer ST than LT infants.

Conclusions

Intravenous amoxicillin/ceftazidime administration affects intestinal microbiota composition by decreasing the relative abundance of Escherichia-Shigella and Streptococcus, while increasing the relative abundance of Enterococcus and Lactobacillus species during the first two postnatal weeks. Thriving of enterococci at the expense of bifidobacteria and streptococci should be considered as aspect of the cost-benefit determination for antibiotic prescription.

Peer Review reports

Background

Neonatal infections are a major cause of mortality and morbidity, especially in preterm infants [1, 2]. Since symptoms of infection are mostly non-specific and infection can rapidly progress, most preterm infants are treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics before diagnosis. This, however, could result in overtreatment and increased risk of selection for resistant bacteria [3]. To reduce antibiotic use, the need for further antibiotic treatment is evaluated after 36–48 h. In addition to increasing the risk of antibiotic resistance, antibiotics might interfere with the development of the intestinal microbiota. During birth and thereafter, microbes rapidly colonise the human gastrointestinal tract. This process is not yet completely understood as it is highly dynamic and influenced by multiple host and environmental factors [4]. An abnormal pattern of bacterial colonisation has been observed in preterm infants compared to term infants, associated with greater exposure to factors like caesarean section, hospitalisation, formula feeding and antibiotic treatment [5, 6]. Gut microbiota development coincides with, and influences, development of the gastrointestinal tract and immune system. Disturbances in early life microbiota development could therefore affect early and later life health outcomes [7, 8]. Previous studies showed that the intestinal microbiota of preterm infants is affected by antibiotic treatment and characterised by high levels of facultative anaerobic bacteria and delayed colonisation with obligate anaerobes like Bifidobacterium [9,10,11]. The use of antibiotics in early-life, and corresponding disturbances of the gut microbiota, have been associated with negative health outcomes, including asthma, atopy and obesity [12,13,14]. Despite increasing knowledge about the effect of antibiotics on the microbiota, limited research focussed on antibiotic treatment duration [15,16,17]. We determined the effect of short-term and long-term postpartum antibiotic treatment on the gut microbiota throughout the first six postnatal weeks in 63 infants. Herein, the primary outcome was defined as the effect of antibiotic treatment duration on microbiota composition. As secondary outcome, the effect of other parameters on microbiota composition were studied, including gestational age, delivery mode, maternal antibiotics, enteral feeding tolerance, feeding type and respiratory support.

Methods

Subjects and sample collection

This study was part of an observational, single-centre, non-intervention study involving (pre) term infants admitted to the hospital level III neonatal intensive care unit or level II neonatal ward of Isala in Zwolle, The Netherlands. Infants born between 32 and 42 weeks gestation, admitted to the level II neonatal ward without major congenital malformation or malformations of the gastrointestinal tract, were eligible for inclusion. Informed consent was obtained from both parents of all individual participants. A total of 125 infants were eligible, of which seven infants were excluded due to incompliance, 40 infants were excluded due to incomplete longitudinal sampling or insufficient sample quantity, and 15 infants were previously included in a pilot study, resulting in 63 infants for inclusion. Infants were fed own mother’s milk, which was supplemented with (preterm) infant formula containing GOS/FOS when needed. Infants received either no (control, n = 28), short-term (< 3 days, ST, n = 22) or long-term (> 5 days, LT, n = 13) treatment with amoxicillin/ceftazidime (100 mg/kg/day amoxicillin / 100 mg/kg/day ceftazidime divided over two doses) during the first postnatal week. Antibiotic treatment started at the day of birth on the clinical suspicion of early-onset neonatal sepsis according to the hospital protocol (maternal risk factors as chorioamnionitis, fever, elevated infection parameters, Group B Streptococcus-carrier, preterm premature rupture of membranes < 35 weeks gestation, unexplained preterm birth with respiratory distress, clinical symptoms of sepsis or meningitis, need for artificial ventilation) and judgement by the attending physician. After 48 h, the need of antibiotic treatment was evaluated based on clinical signs, blood culture and serial C-reactive protein. Faecal samples were collected at postnatal weeks one, two, three, four and six, resulting in 263 samples, which were stored at − 20 °C until transfer to − 80 °C. Infant demographics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Patient demographics
Full size table

16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing

DNA extraction, library preparation and sequencing were performed by LifeSequencing S.L. (Valencia, Spain). DNA was extracted from 200 mg faeces using the QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen), including cell disruption by bead beating. DNA was purified and concentrated using the PowerMag DNA clean-up kit (MoBio) and 50 ng of DNA was amplified according to the Metagenomic Sequencing Library Illumina 15,044,223 B protocol (Illumina) using 16S rRNA gene primers for region V3-V4 [18]. Libraries were quantified using the Quant-iT™ PicoGreen™ dsDNA Assay Kit (Thermofisher) and pooled prior to sequencing on the MiSeq platform (Illumina, 300 bases, paired-end).

Data analysis

Read filtering, operational taxonomic unit (OTU)-picking and taxonomic assignment were performed using the NG-Tax pipeline with following settings: read length of 70, ratio OTU abundance of 2, classify ratio of 0.8, minimum percentage threshold of 0.5, identity level of 100%, error correction of 98.5, using the Silva 128 database [19, 20]. Coordinate analysis and differential abundance testing were performed in R (v3.6.1) using the packages phyloseq (v1.30.0), DESeq2 (v1.26.0), ggpubr (v0.2.4), microbiome (v1.8.0) and vegan (v2.5–6). To correlate the relative abundance of bacterial taxa with each other, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was determined. Prior differential abundance testing and correlation analysis, bacterial genera present in less than 25% of samples were removed to minimise zero-variance errors and spurious significance. For within infant (dependent) or between infants (independent) comparisons, the nonparametric Wilcoxon Signed Rank test and Kruskal-Wallis test were applied, respectively. To relate microbiota composition to clinical data, redundancy analysis (RDA) was performed using Canoco multivariate statistics software v5. Clinical factors included in the analysis are shown in Additional file 2 and were considered to have a significant influence on microbiota composition when the false discovery rate (FDR) corrected p-value was below 0.05.

Results

Differences in gut microbiota composition between infants receiving no, short or long antibiotic treatment

Faecal microbiota composition was determined during the first six postnatal weeks in moderate- to late-preterm and term infants (32–42 weeks gestation) receiving either no (control), short-term (ST) or long-term (LT) antibiotic treatment during the first postnatal week (Fig. 1). Overall microbiota composition was significantly associated with antibiotic treatment duration during the first three postnatal weeks, but not at postnatal weeks four and six (Additional file 1). Differential abundance testing revealed that, at the first postnatal week, ST and LT infants’ microbiota contained significantly lower relative abundance of Escherichia-Shigella (Log2FoldChange = − 7.498, p = 0.0003; Log2FoldChange = − 5.442, p = 0.008, respectively) and Streptococcus (Log2FoldChange = − 4.011, p = 0.027; Log2FoldChange = − 3.795, p = 0.018, respectively), while higher abundance of Lactobacillus (Log2FoldChange = 27.979, p = 3.11 × 10− 21; Log2FoldChange = 6.743, p = 0.030, respectively) as compared to control infants. In LT infants, higher relative abundance of Enterococcus was observed at the second postnatal week, as compared to control infants (Log2FoldChange = 2.996, p = 0.005).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Microbiota composition profiles in control, ST and LT infants during the first six postnatal weeks, with a focus on Bifidobacterium and Enterococcus. Bar graphs: Average relative abundances per time point are shown. Line graphs: Mean ± 95% confidence interval are shown

Full size image

A comparison between ST and LT infants revealed significantly higher relative abundance of Clostridium sensu stricto 1 (Log2FoldChange = 21.783, p = 2.63 × 10− 12) and lower abundance of Veillonella (Log2FoldChange = − 26.954, p = 2.05 × 10− 18) at the first postnatal week. During the first two postnatal weeks, Enterococcus became an abundant member of the community in a higher percentage of LT than ST infants (Fig. 2). In addition, Bifidobacterium was an abundant community member in a higher percentage of ST than LT infants at postnatal weeks four and six (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Fraction of infants in which Bifidobacterium (a) or Enterococcus (b) was an abundant member of the bacterial community. An abundant member was defined as a relative abundance of ≥10%

Full size image

Community richness and diversity were not consistently affected by antibiotic treatment. Instead, community richness and diversity related to which taxa dominated the community. In mixed communities and communities in which Bifidobacterium was abundant, richness and diversity were higher than when either Enterococcus, Streptococcus or Staphylococcus was abundant, with lowest richness and diversity being observed for Enterococcus (Additional file 4).

Gut microbiota succession in infants receiving no, short or long antibiotic treatment

The bacterial genera Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, Escherichia-Shigella and members of the Enterobacteriaceae family made up the biggest proportion of the (pre) term infant faecal microbiota (Fig. 1). Relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae negatively correlated with abundance of Escherichia-Shigella (ρ = − 0.275, p = 4.0 × 10− 6). Enterococcus abundance negatively correlated with Bifidobacterium (ρ = − 0.260, p = 1.3 × 10− 5) and Streptococcus (ρ = − 0.279, p = 3 × 10− 6).

In control infants, the intestinal microbiota was characterised by high relative abundance of Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, Escherichia-Shigella and members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (Fig. 1). During the first six postnatal weeks, a trend of increasing relative abundance of Lactobacillus (Log2FoldChange = 5.075, p = 0.082) and decreasing Staphylococcus (Log2FoldChange = − 4.996, p = 0.084) was observed.

The intestinal microbiota of infants receiving short-term antibiotic treatment was characterised by high relative abundance of Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Escherichia-Shigella, Clostridium and members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (Fig. 1). During the first six postnatal weeks, relative abundance of Streptococcus significantly increased (Log2FoldChange = 7.112, p = 0.015), and a trend of increasing relative abundance of Bifidobacterium (Log2FoldChange = 4.820, p = 0.098) was observed.

The intestinal microbiota of infants receiving long-term antibiotic treatment was characterised by high relative abundance of Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, Clostridium, Staphylococcus, Escherichia-Shigella, Bacteroides and members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (Fig. 1). Over time, a trend of increasing Streptococcus (Log2FoldChange = 5.705, p = 0.050) was observed.

Bacterial richness and diversity generally increased over time in all infants, independent of antibiotic treatment duration (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Community richness and diversity during the first six postnatal weeks in control (a), ST (b) and LT (c) infants. Boxplots show the median, 25th and 75th percentiles, and minimal and maximal values with the exception of outliers (circles) and extremes (asterisks). Differences in richness and diversity between time points were determined using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test with Monte Carlo permutation

Full size image

Clinical variables associated with microbiota composition during the first six postnatal weeks

The effect of various clinical characteristics on microbiota composition was determined by redundancy analysis. Clinical variables explaining variation in microbiota composition were group-specific, and included delivery mode, feeding-related factors and postnatal age (Table 2). When combining the three groups, antibiotic treatment duration explained 2.5% of variation in microbiota composition between samples (Table 2). In addition, postnatal age (5.5%), gender (2.9%), days until full enteral feeding (2.2%), delivery mode (2.0%) and gestational age (1.5%) affected microbiota composition (Table 2). Males were associated with increased abundance of Escherichia-Shigella, while females were associated with increased abundance of other members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (Additional file 3). This difference was statistically significant at postnatal weeks two, three and four (p < 0.05). Increased postnatal age, no antibiotic treatment, less days until full enteral feeding and higher gestational age were associated with increased abundance of Bifidobacterium (Additional file 3). Regarding gestational age, this study comprised preterm and term infants. The intestinal microbiota of term and preterm infants responded to antibiotic treatment in a similar manner (Additional file 5). On average, Bifidobacterium abundance was higher in term compared to preterm infants, however, this was not statistically significant.

Table 2 Factors explaining the variation in microbiota composition between samples as determined by redundancy analysis. Factors significantly explaining the variation are shown
Full size table

Discussion

Intravenous antibiotic administration for prevention and treatment of infection and sepsis occurs frequently in neonatal units. Therefore, it is of great relevance to study side effects of antibiotic treatment, including its effect on gut microbiota development. We studied the effect of postpartum antibiotic treatment duration on microbiota development in 63 (pre) term infants during the first six postnatal weeks.

The genera Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, Escherichia-Shigella and members of the Enterobacteriaceae family made up the biggest proportion of the (pre) term infant faecal microbiota. Relative abundances of Enterococcus and Staphylococcus decreased during the first six postnatal weeks, while abundances of Streptococcus and Bifidobacterium increased. Overall microbiota composition was associated with antibiotic treatment duration during the first three postnatal weeks. Short- and long-term antibiotic treatment with amoxicillin/ceftazidime affected microbiota composition by decreasing the relative abundance of Escherichia-Shigella and Streptococcus, while increasing the relative abundance of Enterococcus and Lactobacillus species, which is in concordance with our previous findings [17]. Ceftazidime and amoxicillin are broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics, targeting Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. It has been shown that Bifidobacterium species are sensitive to β-lactam antibiotics and that treatment with amoxicillin can greatly influence the composition of Bifidobacterium species in infant intestinal microbiota [21,22,23]. As such, establishment of a Bifidobacterium-dominated microbiota can be delayed or prohibited. Strikingly, relative abundance of Enterococcus increased after long-term antibiotic treatment, which might indicate antibiotic resistance, as it is a target organism of amoxicillin. As some Enterococcus species emerged from gut commensals to nosocomial pathogens, this might pose a health risk for the infants [24]. Indeed, Enterococcus species have been identified as causative organism in late-onset sepsis [25, 26]. However, the applied methodology herein cannot reliably identify Enterococcus to species level, and whether absolute abundances of Enterococcus increased has not been elucidated in the study herein.

Few differences in microbiota composition were observed between infants receiving short- or long-term antibiotic treatment. However, its noteworthy that Enterococcus became an abundant community member in a higher percentage of long- than short-treated infants. As well, Bifidobacterium did not become an abundant community member in a higher percentage of long- than short-treated infants. This indicates that long antibiotic treatment has a more profound effect on microbiota development than short treatment, similar to what we have previously reported [17]. High inter-individual variation, in combination with the relatively small number of long-treated infants, most certainly decreased statistical power. In addition, inclusion of all infants, instead of studying a carefully selected subset, did not allow to prevent possible bias by parameters like gestational age, delivery mode, gender, maternal antibiotics and feeding. For example, 46.2% of long-treated infants were born at term, while only 13.6% of short-treated infants were born at term. Nevertheless, stratification of infants based on preterm and term birth indicated similar response to antibiotic treatment.

Community richness and diversity were not consistently affected by antibiotic treatment. Instead, richness and diversity increased over time, and were related to which bacterial taxon was abundant. Richness and diversity were lower when either Enterococcus, Streptococcus or Staphylococcus was abundant, and higher when other bacterial taxa, including Bifidobacterium, were abundant. As the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium increased over time, postnatal age and Bifidobacterium abundance were related, hindering the elucidation of their sole effect on community richness and diversity.

In addition to antibiotic treatment duration, microbiota composition was associated with postnatal age, gender, days until full enteral feeding, delivery mode and gestational age. Increased gestational and postnatal age and less days until full enteral feeding were associated with higher abundance of early life coloniser Bifidobacterium. A Bifidobacterium-dominated microbiota is more representative of microbiota development in term, vaginally born, breast-fed infants, which is considered most beneficial during early life development [27]. The beneficial effect of Bifidobacterium species is speculated to be obtained by providing protection against pathogens and via its immune modulating properties [28]. Since dominance by Bifidobacterium, compared to other bacterial taxa, allowed for higher community richness and diversity, we speculate that Bifidobacterium species control, but not outcompete, other bacterial species. Bifidobacteria could therefore play an important role in development of a healthy and diverse ecosystem that promotes tolerance induction and immune system maturation. In addition, bifidobacteria are optimal milk degraders, and known for their role in degradation of simple and complex sugars like human milk oligosaccharides [29]. Early differences in microbiota composition may therefore affect an infants’ food digestion capacity and subsequent energy harvest [30, 31]. This is particularly relevant for preterm born infants with protein and energy deficits [32, 33]. Regarding gender, males microbiota contained higher abundance of Escherichia-Shigella, while the microbiota of females contained more members of the Enterobacteriaceae family that could not be classified to genus level. Several studies have shown that gut microbiota composition differs between adult males and females [34, 35], but gender-effect during early life is relatively unexplored [36]. It is important to note that while many clinical variables were included in the analysis, they did not capture the full extent of microbiota variation observed between samples. As such, unknown determinants affecting microbiota composition in (pre) term infants remain.

Conclusions

Our findings show that intravenous administration of amoxicillin/ceftazidime affects intestinal microbiota composition, particularly by decreasing the relative abundance of Escherichia-Shigella and Streptococcus, while increasing the relative abundance of Lactobacillus and Enterococcus species during the first two postnatal weeks. Short and long antibiotic treatment both allow for intestinal microbiota restoration within the first six postnatal weeks as characterised by increasing relative abundance of Bifidobacterium species. Long treatment, however, potentially has more enduring effect on microbiota development than short treatment, but this needs to be further elucidated. Although being of short-term, the rise of enterococci at expense of bifidobacteria and streptococci, including the potential effect of disturbed microbiota development on health outcomes, should be considered as aspect of the cost-benefit determination for antibiotic prescription.

Availability of data and materials

Raw sequencing data and supporting metadata are available in the European Nucleotide Archive (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) under study accession PRJEB26802.

Abbreviations

FDR:

False discovery rate

OTU:

Operational taxonomic unit

RDA:

Redundancy analysis

ST:

Short-term

LT:

Long-term

References

  1. Khan AM, Morris SK, Bhutta ZA. Neonatal and perinatal infections. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2017;64(4):785–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shane AL, Sanchez PJ, Stoll BJ. Neonatal sepsis. Lancet. 2017;390(10104):1770–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schulman J, Dimand RJ, Lee HC, Duenas GV, Bennett MV, Gould JB. Neonatal intensive care unit antibiotic use. Pediatrics. 2015;135(5):826–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodriguez JM, Murphy K, Stanton C, Ross RP, Kober OI, Juge N, et al. The composition of the gut microbiota throughout life, with an emphasis on early life. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015;26:26050.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Forsgren M, Isolauri E, Salminen S, Rautava S. Late preterm birth has direct and indirect effects on infant gut microbiota development during the first six months of life. Acta Paediatr. 2017;106(7):1103–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gregory KE, Samuel BS, Houghteling P, Shan G, Ausubel FM, Sadreyev RI, et al. Influence of maternal breast milk ingestion on acquisition of the intestinal microbiome in preterm infants. Microbiome. 2016;4(1):68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke G, O'Mahony SM, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Priming for health: gut microbiota acquired in early life regulates physiology, brain and behaviour. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103(8):812–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vangay P, Ward T, Gerber JS, Knights D. Antibiotics, pediatric dysbiosis, and disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(5):553–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Arboleya S, Sanchez B, Milani C, Duranti S, Solis G, Fernandez N, et al. Intestinal microbiota development in preterm neonates and effect of perinatal antibiotics. J Pediatr. 2015;166(3):538–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gibson MK, Crofts TS, Dantas G. Antibiotics and the developing infant gut microbiota and resistome. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;27:51–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zwittink RD, van Zoeren-Grobben D, Martin R, van Lingen RA, Groot Jebbink LJ, Boeren S, et al. Metaproteomics reveals functional differences in intestinal microbiota development of preterm infants. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2017;16(9):1610–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Korpela K, Salonen A, Virta LJ, Kekkonen RA, Forslund K, Bork P, et al. Intestinal microbiome is related to lifetime antibiotic use in Finnish pre-school children. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rasmussen SH, Shrestha S, Bjerregaard LG, Angquist LH, Baker JL, Jess T, et al. Antibiotic exposure in early life and childhood overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(6):1508–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wopereis H, Sim K, Shaw A, Warner JO, Knol J, Kroll JS. Intestinal microbiota in infants at high risk for allergy: effects of prebiotics and role in eczema development. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(4):1334–42 e5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dardas M, Gill SR, Grier A, Pryhuber GS, Gill AL, Lee YH, et al. The impact of postnatal antibiotics on the preterm intestinal microbiome. Pediatr Res. 2014;76(2):150–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Greenwood C, Morrow AL, Lagomarcino AJ, Altaye M, Taft DH, Yu Z, et al. Early empiric antibiotic use in preterm infants is associated with lower bacterial diversity and higher relative abundance of Enterobacter. J Pediatr. 2014;165(1):23–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zwittink RD, Renes IB, van Lingen RA, van Zoeren-Grobben D, Konstanti P, Norbruis OF, Martin R, Groot Jebbink LJM, Knol J, Belzer C. Association between duration of intravenous antibiotic administration and early-life microbiota development in late-preterm infants. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;37(3):475–83. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s10096-018-3193-y. Epub 2018 Jan 24.

  18. Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(1):e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D590–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramiro-Garcia J, Hermes GDA, Giatsis C et al. NG-Tax, a highly accurate and validated pipeline for analysis of 16S rRNA amplicons from complex biomes. F1000Research. 2018;5:1791. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.12688/f1000research.9227.2.

  21. Delgado S, Florez AB, Mayo B. Antibiotic susceptibility of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species from the human gastrointestinal tract. Curr Microbiol. 2005;50(4):202–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Moubareck C, Gavini F, Vaugien L, Butel MJ, Doucet-Populaire F. Antimicrobial susceptibility of bifidobacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55(1):38–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mangin I, Suau A, Gotteland M, Brunser O, Pochart P. Amoxicillin treatment modifies the composition of Bifidobacterium species in infant intestinal microbiota. Anaerobe. 2010;16(4):433–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gilmore MS, Lebreton F, van Schaik W. Genomic transition of enterococci from gut commensals to leading causes of multidrug-resistant hospital infection in the antibiotic era. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013;16(1):10–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bizzarro MJ, Shabanova V, Baltimore RS, Dembry LM, Ehrenkranz RA, Gallagher PG. Neonatal sepsis 2004-2013: the rise and fall of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Pediatr. 2015;166(5):1193–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cortese F, Scicchitano P, Gesualdo M, Filaninno A, De Giorgi E, Schettini F, et al. Early and late infections in newborns: where do we stand? A Review. Pediatrics Neonatology. 2016;57(4):265–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Turroni F, Milani C, Duranti S, Ferrario C, Lugli GA, Mancabelli L, et al. Bifidobacteria and the infant gut: an example of co-evolution and natural selection. Cell Mol life Sci. 2018;75(1):103–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ruiz L, Delgado S, Ruas-Madiedo P, Sanchez B, Margolles A. Bifidobacteria and their molecular communication with the immune system. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2345.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. O'Callaghan A, van Sinderen D. Bifidobacteria and their role as members of the human gut microbiota. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:925.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jumpertz R, Le DS, Turnbaugh PJ, Trinidad C, Bogardus C, Gordon JI, et al. Energy-balance studies reveal associations between gut microbes, caloric load, and nutrient absorption in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(1):58–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1027–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Grier A, Qiu X, Bandyopadhyay S, Holden-Wiltse J, Kessler HA, Gill AL, et al. Impact of prematurity and nutrition on the developing gut microbiome and preterm infant growth. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Henderickx JGE, Zwittink RD, van Lingen RA, Knol J, Belzer C. The preterm gut microbiota: an inconspicuous challenge in nutritional neonatal care. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Markle JG, Frank DN, Mortin-Toth S, Robertson CE, Feazel LM, Rolle-Kampczyk U, et al. Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity. Science. 2013;339(6123):1084–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mueller S, Saunier K, Hanisch C, Norin E, Alm L, Midtvedt T, et al. Differences in fecal microbiota in different European study populations in relation to age, gender, and country: a cross-sectional study. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(2):1027–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Martin R, Makino H, Cetinyurek Yavuz A, Ben-Amor K, Roelofs M, Ishikawa E, et al. Early-life events, including mode of delivery and type of feeding, siblings and gender, shape the developing gut microbiota. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0158498.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, 6708WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Romy D. Zwittink, Jan Knol & Clara Belzer

  2. Princess Amalia Dpt of Paediatrics, Dpt of Neonatology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands

    Diny van Zoeren-Grobben, Richard A. van Lingen, Obbe F. Norbruis & Liesbeth J. Groot Jebbink

  3. Danone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Ingrid B. Renes, Rocio Martin & Jan Knol

Authors
  1. Romy D. Zwittink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Diny van Zoeren-Grobben
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ingrid B. Renes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard A. van Lingen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Obbe F. Norbruis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rocio Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Liesbeth J. Groot Jebbink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jan Knol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Clara Belzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RDZ: Experimental design, data acquisition, data analysis, interpretation of findings, manuscript preparation. DvZ: Study design, sample acquisition, interpretation of findings, manuscript revision. IBR: Interpretation of findings, manuscript revision. RAvL: Study design, sample acquisition, interpretation of findings, manuscript revision. OFN: Study design, sample acquisition, revision of manuscript. RM: Study design, revision of manuscript. LJGJ: Sample acquisition, revision of manuscript. JK: Study design, experimental design, interpretation of findings, revision of manuscript. CB: Experimental design, interpretation of findings, revision of manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clara Belzer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The board from the Medical Ethical Committee of Isala Zwolle concluded that this study does not fall under the scope of the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO). Written informed consent was obtained from both parents of all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors IBR, RM and JK are employees of Danone Nutricia Research. The authors RDZ and CB were financially supported by Danone Nutricia Research.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) plots using Bray-Curtis distances. The association of microbiota composition with postnatal week (WoL) or antibiotic treatment duration (AB1_dur) was assessed by Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) using the ‘adonis’ function with 999 permutations

Additional file 2.

Clinical factors included during redundancy analysis (RDA)

Additional file 3.

Redundancy analysis using microbiota composition profiles from (A) control infants and (B) all infants. Species with a 15-100% fit into the ordination space and explanatory variables that significantly explain variation are shown. Abbreviations: C-section: caesarean section, AB: antibiotics, FEF: full enteral feeding, PNW: postnatal weeks.

Additional file 4.

Richness and diversity in samples with different dominating bacterial taxa. Taxa were considered dominant in a sample when it was the most abundant taxon and at least 10% more abundant than the second most abundant taxon. When the difference between the two most abundant taxa was less than 10%, is was considered a mixed community. Boxplots show the median, 25th and 75th percentiles, and minimal and maximal values with the exception of outliers (circles) and extremes (asterisks). Lines above the graph indicate between which communities a significant difference in richness/diversity was observed

Additional file 5..

Microbiota composition profiles during the first six postnatal weeks in preterm and term infants receiving no, short or long antibiotic treatment. Average relative abundances per time point are shown.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zwittink, R.D., van Zoeren-Grobben, D., Renes, I.B. et al. Dynamics of the bacterial gut microbiota in preterm and term infants after intravenous amoxicillin/ceftazidime treatment. BMC Pediatr 20, 195 (2020). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12887-020-02067-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12887-020-02067-z

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us