Skip to main content

Table 1 Description of the included studies

From: Coughing children in family practice and primary care: a systematic review of prevalence, aetiology and prognosis

Studies

Country

Setting

Time of recruit-ment

Data assess-ment

Study population:

Number of

females

Age in study sample (years1)

Inclusion (IN) / Exclusion (EX) criteria

Out-come

Boyce 2019 [20]

Malawi

57 health facilities with 250 health surveillance assistants for integrated community case management

n.r.

prospectively

987 children

♀52%

Ø23.4 months

IN: first 4 children, aged 2–59 months, presenting to the health surveillance assistants for an initial consultation of their current illness

EX: severely ill children who needed urgent referral to a health facility

Pre

Cazzato 2001 [21]

Italy

35 family paediatricians in Southern Italy

04–06/1998

prospectively

9917 children

♀50%

< 12:

≤2: 40.5%

3–6: 33.5%

7–12: 26%

IN: every patient-doctor contact on an index-day of the week over a 3-month period

Pre

Giannattasio 2014 [22]

Italy

3 primary care paediatric practices in Naples

12/2011–01/2012

prospectively

284 patients

188 consultations due to symptoms

♀ 54%

Ø 4.8

0–2: 25%

3–5: 36%

6–8: 20%

9–11: 13%

12–14: 6%

IN: all children aged 0–14 years observed in the index days

Pre

Hall 2017 [23]

Australia

1 Aboriginal-owned and operated comprehensive primary health-care service

02/2013–10/2015

prospectively

121 children

♀ 49%

0: 32.8%

1: 26.7%

2: 16.1%

3–4: 24.4%

Ø18.4 months

IN: children presenting for any reason, aged < 5 years, registered at the healthcare service and parent willing/able to complete study requirements

EX: family was planning to move from the area in the following 12 months

Pre

Harnden 2006 [24]

UK

18 general practices

10/2001–05/2005

prospectively

172 patients

♀ 45%

Ø 9.1 (positive pertussis serology) – 9.8 (negative pertussis serology)

IN: children, aged 5–16 years, with cough ≥14 days

EX: refused blood sample

Aet

Prog

Krishnan 2019 [25]

USA

1 predominantly suburban, academic paediatric faculty practice

1 year

retrospectively

560 consultations

♀ 47%

19 days - 18 years

Ø 6.6

< 2: 18%

2–5: 41%

IN: children with completed electronic health record cough template

Aet

Leconte 2011 [26]

Belgium

36 primary care practices

02–03/2006

prospectively

345 patients

n.r.

IN: all consulting children aged 5–17 years

Pre

Mash 2012 [27]

South Africa

83 primary care clinics, 17 mobile clinics, 12 community health centres; nurse-led with support from doctors

1 year

prospectively

5545 reasons for encounter

< 1–14

IN: all ambulatory patients aged 0–14 years seen by health workers

Pre

Molony 2016 [28]

Ireland

1 large general practice with 4 GPs in a primary healthcare centre in North Cork

10/2010–10/2014

retrospectively

5100 patients

52,572 consultations

70,489 RFE

n.r.

IN: doctor-patient face-to-face encounters (children aged < 7 years) on all working days and 146 non-working days with a documentation of diagnostic code in the electronic medical record

EX: contacts with practice nurse/ practice’s administrative team, telephone or ‘out-of-hours’ contacts

Pre

Morrell 1971/1972 [29, 30]

UK

1 general practice with 3 GPs

1 year

prospectively

707 patients

4467 consultations

♀ 51.3%

n.r.

IN: new patient-initiated consultations with symptoms not presented to any doctor in the previous 12 months, children aged 0–14 years

EX: doctor-initiated consultations

Pre

Movsowitz 1987 [31]

South Africa

1 private paediatric practice in Cape Town

1984–1985

prospectively

256 patients

3 months −15 years

IN: patients with cough > 3 weeks

Aet

NAMCS Schappert 1999 [32]

USA

195 office-based paediatricians

01/1995–12/1996

prospectively

92,888 consultations

♀ 49.5%

< 15: 89.6%

15–24 6.2%

25–44: 2.5%

45–64: 1.1%

IN: office visits to non-federally employed paediatricians occurring during a randomly assigned 1-week reporting period

EX: telephone contacts and visits made outside the physician’s office, visits to government-operated facilities and hospital-based outpatient departments

Pre

Nizami 1997 [33]

Pakistan

65 GPs and 29 paediatricians in Karachi

04–12/1992

prospectively

2433 consultations

n.r.

IN: children aged < 5 years

Pre

Njalsson 1992 [34]

Iceland

12 rural and 4 urban primary care health centres

01–12/1988

prospectively

67,746 RFE

0–14

IN: all contacts with children aged 0–14 years, including prescriptions, follow-up visits, tests, procedures and administrative visits

Pre

SESAM 2 Study Frese 2011 [35]

Germany

209 GPs in the federal state of Saxony

10/1999–09/2000

prospectively

805 patients

1196 RFE

0–4: 13.3%

5–9: 14.7%

10–14: 20.8%

15–19: 51.2%

IN: randomly selected children, aged 0- ≤ 19 years, presenting in general practice (tenth consultation of the consultation hour) previously known to the practitioner

EX: house calls, patients already included in SESAM 2 study

Pre

Simoes 1997 [36]

Ethiopia

3 primary health centres with 6 outpatient clinic nurses

3 weeks in August

prospectively

449 patients

♀ 54%

2–11 months: 36%

IN: any sick child, aged 2 months – 5 years, presenting during study hours

Pre

TRANSITION Okkes 2002 [37]

Netherlands

54 family physicians in 23 locations in the Netherlands

1985–1995

prospectively

3371 episodes of care

n.r.

IN: episode data for all face-to-face encounters with paediatricians’ listed patients, aged 0–14 years, including encounters for prevention

Aet

Usherwood 1991 [38]

UK

1 general practice in Scotland

12/1986–01/1988

prospectively

466 consultations (including 147 home visits)

n.r.

IN: all health centre consultations of children, aged 2–13 years

Pre

Vinson 1993 [39]

USA, Canada

44 primary care practices in the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN)

10/1990–01/1991

prospectively

1398 patients

♀ 47%

infancy - ≤14

Ø 4,8

IN: children aged 0–14 years with cough ≤1 month

Aet

  1. Legend: 1 = unless otherwise stated, aet = aetiology of the symptom cough in primary care, n.r. = not reported, pre = prevalence of the symptom cough in primary care, prog = prognosis of the symptom cough in primary care, resp. = respectively, RFE = reasons for encounter, ♀ = female, Ø = mean